SCA Judgment Media Statement

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

MEDIA STATEMENT – CASE HEARING IN SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL

Northwest Provincial Government and Another v Tswaing Consulting CC and Others

Supreme Court of Appeal - 190/2005	Hearing date: 02 November 2006
	Judgment date: 21 November 2006
Appeal – postponement – refused where litigant and attorney knew appeal pending but did nothing despite reminders – Fraud inducing contract – victim entitled to rescind – rule as to evidence regarding forfeiture of election restated – Restitution when fraudulently induced contract rescinded – once victim establishes fraud, and entitlement to rescind contract, it is entitled to repayment in the absence of evidence showing that restitution would be unjust


Media Summary of Judgment
In a judgment delivered today, the Supreme Court of Appeal has ordered a corporation that defrauded the Northwest Province to repay the province R4 319 378.50 plus interest. The case arose from a fraud perpetrated against the province by Tswaing Consulting CC (Tswaing) and its principal member, Mr Swai Mathaniel Mangope, with the help of accomplices in the provincial bureaucracy. The province and its tender board applied to the High Court at Mmabatho to set aside a tender award, service contract and arbitration agreement with Tswaing, and for repayment of R4 319 378.50 plus interest. Landman J dismissed their application. The SCA has reversed this judgment. It has set aside the fraudulently procured agreements, and ordered Tswaing to repay all moneys pocketed under them. The fraud had its origin in an ambitious programme the province embarked on in 2000 to upgrade, rehabilitate and repair its roads on a budget of over R156 million. Through the fraudulent interventions of a provincial deputy director-general. Mr Martin Oleboheng Sebakwane, and a chief financial officer in the provincial department of transport (who was also chair of the departmental tender committee), Mr Kweku Odame-Takyi, colluding with Mangope, the province – with Sebakwane as signatory – in December 2000 signed a ‘service agreement’ with Tswaing, even though it had no experience in roads or civil engineering projects. The tender board did not approve the agreement: but on the basis of bogus documentation it later gave approval for the ‘ex post facto appointment’ of Tswaing. Between January and August 2001 Tswaing quickly pocketed disbursements of over R4 million by the province. An investigation by a major firm of auditors, PWC, comprehensively established the fraud. The report was submitted to the province in January 2002. But its existence and its findings were not communicated to those in the roads and public works department dealing directly with Tswaing. And when Tswaing claimed damages of R400 million, the department in August 2003 entered into an arbitration agreement with it to settle its claims. But as soon as the department’s chief financial officer, Mr Mawethu Xolani Mtyhuda, became aware of the damning report, he immediately moved to halt the arbitration and cancel the agreement. The SCA has upheld the province’s claim. It has found that the conclusion of the court below that the province failed effectually to cancel the agreement, or that it elected to abide by it, was based on a misapprehension of the evidence. The judge also overlooked that to allow Tswaing to enforce the arbitration agreement – which was the tainted product of Tswaing’s fraud – would be offensive to justice.